Case 4123348/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123348/2018 Mr S Grady v Represented by: Mr D Martyn - Solicitor Sparrows Offshore Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123348/2018
- Decision date
- 4 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123348/2018 Mr S Grady
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Grady brought a claim against Sparrows Offshore Services Limited, with Mr D Martyn and Ms V Kerr named as the respective representatives. Employment Judge Nicol Hosie signed the judgment on 2 April 2019, entered in the register on 4 April 2019.
The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted judgment does not set out the substantive facts of the dispute, identify the legal claim type, or record any monetary award. No remedy was ordered.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted text does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.