Case 4123362/2018 · Employment Tribunal
No: 4123362/2018 Mrs J McConnachie v Represented by: Mr A Wallace, Solicitor Grampian Health Board — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123362/2018
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hosie Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No: 4123362/2018 Mrs J McConnachie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mrs J McConnachie’s claim was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge Hosie dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted text does not set out separate findings on the underlying breach of contract or unfair dismissal issues, and it records no liability determination, remedy assessment, or monetary award. The only outcome stated is dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52, but does not separate the claims individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52, but does not separate the claims individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.