Case 4123498/2018 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123498/2018 Open Preliminary Hearing Held in Edinburgh on March 2019 Employment Judge: E J Bell (Sitting Alone) Mr S Martin v , Mother Install Scotland — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123498/2018
- Decision date
- 27 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emma Bell
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123498/2018 Open Preliminary Hearing Held in Edinburgh on March 2019 Employment Judge: E J Bell (Sitting Alone) Mr S Martin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing on 26 March 2019, Employment Judge E J Bell, sitting alone, recorded that the respondent, Install Scotland, was neither present nor represented. The tribunal noted that the claimant, Mr S Martin, had been employed by Alex Miller trading as Install Scotland from 11 June 2018 to 19 November 2018.
The only claim determined in this judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal stated that, upon withdrawal of the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim, that claim was dismissed. No remedy was assessed for that claim in this judgment.
The tribunal directed that a final hearing to determine the merits and remedy in relation to the claimant’s remaining claims would take place on 29 April 2019 at 10:00am.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant withdrew the unfair dismissal claim and that the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.