Case 4123540/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123540/2018 Held in Edinburgh Employment Judge d’Inverno Mr J Alexander v Pendragon PLC, T/A Evans Halshaw Ford st — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123540/2018
- Decision date
- 1 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joseph D’Inverno
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123540/2018 Held in Edinburgh Employment Judge d’Inverno Mr J Alexander
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 16 April 2019 the tribunal gave the claimant until 24 April 2019 to provide written reasons why the unfair dismissal and discrimination claims should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. The tribunal accordingly struck out both claims under rule 37, relying on unreasonable conduct, non-compliance with Judge Macleod's orders dated 25 February 2019, and a failure actively to pursue the proceedings.
The judgment records no substantive merits determination and no monetary award. The decision was issued by Employment Judge Joseph D'Inverno on 30 April 2019 and entered in the register on 1 May 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers only to 'discrimination' and does not identify the protected characteristic in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.