Case 4123608/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4123608/2018 Mrs F MacLaren v Represented by: Mr R Miller - Solicitor John Clark Motor Group Ltd st and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123608/2018
- Decision date
- 19 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alexander Kemp
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4123608/2018 Mrs F MacLaren
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint under sections 19, 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 had been withdrawn by the claimant. It therefore dismissed the complaint under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not contain findings on liability, remedy, or evidence beyond the procedural disposal. No monetary award was made. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Alexander Kemp on 18 February 2019 and entered in the register on 19 February 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the complaint under sections 19, 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The protected characteristic is not expressly stated in the text, but the cited provisions indicate a disability discrimination / reasonable adjustments claim. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.