Case 4123623/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123623/2018 Mr F Coyle v Castle Security Group Northern Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123623/2018
- Decision date
- 4 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123623/2018 Mr F Coyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent failed to enter a response within the time limit. On the material available, Employment Judge Frances Eccles was satisfied that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages succeeded.
The judgment states that the respondent was to pay the claimant £3,385.85. In the reasons, the tribunal referred to the complaint as one of unfair deductions from wages and recorded that, on the available material, remedy could properly be determined in that amount. No separate components of award were identified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not enter a response and the tribunal awarded the amount on the available material. | Upheld | — | £3,386 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,386
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.