Case 4123690/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123690/2018 Mrs A Rennie v W S McCune T/A Prime Cut — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123690/2018
- Decision date
- 4 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123690/2018 Mrs A Rennie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, issued because the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. The Employment Judge determined the case on the available material and cancelled the hearing listed for 8 March 2019.
The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £4,615.36.
It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £11,307.52, calculated as 28 weeks at £403.84 per week.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £807.68. The combined monetary award on the judgment as recorded is £16,730.56.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment: dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded in this sum. | Upheld | — | £4,615 |
| Redundancy | Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was awarded a redundancy payment calculated as 28 weeks x £403.84. | Upheld | — | £11,308 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement; this sum was ordered. | Upheld | — | £808 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,731
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.