Case 4123726/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mr M Greenly One of HM Inspectors Of Health and Safety — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123726/2018
- Decision date
- 14 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis case concerned an appeal by Starfish 9 Limited t/a Starfish Construction against Mr M Greenly, one of HM Inspectors of Health and Safety. The only substantive procedural outcome recorded in the judgment is that the appellant withdrew the appeal.
Following that withdrawal, Employment Judge MacLean dismissed the appeal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive merits findings, liability findings, or remedy assessment are recorded in the extracted text.
The judgment is limited to the dismissal of the withdrawn appeal and does not identify any monetary award, legal test, or panel members beyond the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The appeal was withdrawn by the appellant and the tribunal dismissed it under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.