Case 4123816/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone)5 Andrew McCloy v No appearance East Renfrewshire Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123816/2018
- Decision date
- 30 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michelle Sutherland
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone)5 Andrew McCloy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAndrew McCloy presented a complaint of unfair dismissal. A final hearing was listed for 25, 26, 29 and 30 April 2019, but the claimant did not attend and did not seek a postponement. His representative had not had any contact or instructions from him since 19 April despite repeated attempts to reach him by email and telephone, and therefore withdrew from acting. The tribunal clerk also made unsuccessful attempts on the morning of the hearing to contact the claimant about his intentions.
In those circumstances, the respondent applied for dismissal under Rule 37 or Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. Having considered the information available and the enquiries made about the claimant's absence, the tribunal concluded that the claimant was no longer pursuing the claim and that it should be dismissed under Rule 47 for failure to attend.
The judgment records no substantive findings on the unfair dismissal complaint itself and no monetary award. It also notes that if the claimant had good cause for failing to attend or for failing to seek a postponement, he could apply for reconsideration under Rule 70 within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 for failure to attend the final hearing; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 37 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 70 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.