Case 4123830/2018 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123830/2018 Held in Glasgow on October 2019 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr R Cowan v McTear Contracts Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123830/2018
- Decision date
- 15 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123830/2018 Held in Glasgow on October 2019 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr R Cowan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to be paid £750 gross for work done during the week ending 9 November 2018. It also held that the claimant was entitled to £150 gross for one day of accrued holiday entitlement on termination of employment on 9 November 2018.
The tribunal further held that the respondent was entitled to recover £730 from the claimant for the cost of training provided on 15 and 16 September 2018, under the parties' Training Agreement. The written judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Because the respondent's recovery exceeded the net sums otherwise due to the claimant, the tribunal recorded that there were no monies payable by the respondent to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Entitlement to be paid the gross amount of £750.00 in respect of working during the week ending 9 November 2018. | Upheld | — | £750 |
| Holiday pay | Entitlement to be paid the gross amount of £150.00 in respect of accrued holiday entitlement of one day on termination of employment on 9 November 2018. | Upheld | — | £150 |
| Breach of contract | Respondent entitled to recover £730.00 from the claimant for training provided on 15 and 16 September 2018 under the Training Agreement. | Upheld | — | £730 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.