Case 4123877/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Mr D Bil v JD Coffee Scotland Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123877/2018
- Decision date
- 25 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Mr D Bil
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant started work for JD Coffee Scotland Ltd on or about 10 August 2018 as a Chef de Partie at the respondents' Dundee restaurant, paid £8.00 per hour and working on average 45 hours per week, giving weekly gross pay of £360. On 1 November 2018 he sent an email giving notice that he would leave with effect from 19 November. During the evening of 2 November, however, text messages from the Head Chef told him not to work his notice and that he would finish after that day. The tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 2 November 2018 and that he had been dismissed without notice.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence as credible and reliable. It found that the respondents paid him for hours worked up to 2 November but did not pay any notice pay. Referring to section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal held that he was entitled to one week's notice and awarded £360 as damages for breach of contract, calculated on the basis of his £360 weekly gross pay.
The claimant had also sought payment for accrued holiday on termination. The tribunal accepted his calculation, which used the government holiday pay calculator and his records from CAB assistance. It found that he had accrued 62 hours' holiday entitlement, from which 10.93 hours and 23.05 hours previously paid were deducted, leaving 28 hours. After a later payment for 7.68 hours, 20.32 hours remained outstanding. At £8.00 per hour, the tribunal awarded £162.56 under the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The unfair dismissal claim was not pursued at the hearing because the claimant accepted that he did not have sufficient qualifying service, and the judgment records that claim as dismissed following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages for breach of contract for failure to pay one week's notice pay under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £360 |
| Working time regulations | Awarded under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for 20.32 hours of accrued but untaken holiday at £8 per hour. | Upheld | — | £163 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant withdrew this claim at the hearing; the judgment records it as dismissed following withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £523
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.