Case 4123881/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge J M Hendry Case No: 4123881/2018 Mr A Birnie v Represented by: Mr R A Falconer, Solicitor Grampian Health Board — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123881/2018
- Decision date
- 18 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge J M Hendry Case No: 4123881/2018 Mr A Birnie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant, Mr A Birnie, was represented by Mr R A Falconer and the respondent Grampian Health Board was represented by Mr A Watson. The Employment Judge was Ian McFatridge and the judgment was dated 18 November 2019.
The only substantive disposal recorded is that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No findings on the merits of any discrimination or unfair dismissal complaint are set out in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.