Case 6000039/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000039/2022
- Decision date
- 25 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Ms H Brown, Mr G Corbett
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP on 22 to 25 May 2023 before Employment Judge JM Wade, Ms H Brown and Mr G Corbett. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr M Humphries, counsel.
The tribunal’s unanimous judgment dismissed both complaints. The written text records that the claimant’s Equality Act complaint was dismissed and that the unfair dismissal complaint was not well founded and was dismissed. The decision note states that a summary of the reasons was given orally on 25 May 2023, and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days; no further factual findings or remedy were recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment identifies this only as an Equality Act complaint and does not specify the underlying protected characteristic or any sub-basis in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.