Case 6000046/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Kamali v Pennine GP Alliance Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000046/2022
- Decision date
- 26 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Kamali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds by telephone on 26 January 2023 before Employment Judge Maidment. The judgment records only that the claimant's complaints of victimisation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010, direct sex discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, and any complaint reliant on regulation 10(3) of the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999 were dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of them.
The supplied written record contains no findings on the merits of those complaints and no reasoning beyond the statement that they were withdrawn. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal of the complaint under section 27 Equality Act 2010. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal of the complaint under section 13 Equality Act 2010. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Parental leave | The judgment refers to 'any complaint reliant on Regulation 10(3) of the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999' and records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.