Case 6000064/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Heath v Clevedon Town Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000064/2023
- Decision date
- 7 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Dated
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Mr H J Launder, Mr K Ghotbi-Ravandi
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Heath
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol on 17 to 19 February 2025 before Employment Judge C H O'Rourke sitting with Mr H J Launder and Mr K Ghotbi-Ravandi. The claimant, Ms P Heath, appeared in person and the respondent, Clevedon Town Council, was represented by Ms H Suleman, consultant.
The tribunal's judgment states that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract in respect of pay in lieu of notice, and detriment on grounds of protected disclosure all failed and were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
The record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard post-hearing procedure. The extracted judgment does not set out further findings of fact or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records this as a claim for breach of contract in respect of pay in lieu of notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records this as a detriment claim on grounds of protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.