Case 6000082/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Thompson v GIG Hospitality Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000082/2025
- Decision date
- 18 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Miss H Thompson’s complaint of unauthorised deduction of wages was well-founded. It found that GIG Hospitality Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from wages during the period 16 September 2024 to 15 November 2024 and ordered payment of £3,932.99, described as the gross sum deducted. The claimant was responsible for any tax or national insurance due on that amount.
The tribunal also found the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded. However, it made no separate award on that head because the amount was already included within the wage deduction award made under paragraph 1.
The holiday pay complaint was likewise well-founded. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £500, again with the claimant responsible for any tax or national insurance. The total award was £4,432.99.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 16 September 2024 to 15 November 2024 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £3,933 |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay complaint was well-founded, but no separate award was made because the amount was included in the wage deduction award at paragraph 1. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday pay in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,433
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.