Case 6000094/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Smith v Bionical Solutions Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000094/2023
- Decision date
- 14 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn Mrs K Smith v Bionical Solutions, the Employment Tribunal issued a Rule 21 default judgment because the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment states that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds, but it does not set out any remedy figure. It also states that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. The extracted text does not include any further factual findings or any claim-by-claim reasoning beyond the default judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time; remedy deferred to a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time; remedy deferred to a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.