Miss R Lam v Teleperformance limited — 2024

Case reference: 6000103/2024
Decision date: 12 August 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Bax Dated

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss R Lam

Respondent

Teleperformance limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal had ordered the Claimant on 14 April 2024 to send the Respondent a statement about her alleged disability, together with medical evidence, by 27 May 2024. The Respondent later informed the Tribunal that it had not received that statement, and the Claimant did not provide comments when required to do so by 4 July 2024.

By letter dated 16 July 2024, the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The Claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out and the hearing listed for 13 August 2024 did not proceed.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. It does not identify the substantive causes of action beyond referring to an alleged disability statement and medical evidence.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.