Case 6000112/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Piotr Krawczyk v Clipper Contracting Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000112/2025
- Decision date
- 6 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sanger REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Piotr Krawczyk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningPiotr Krawczyk brought claims against Clipper Contracting Group Ltd for unauthorised deduction from wages and for failure to provide written particulars of wages. The case was heard at Bristol by CVP on 3 October 2025 before Employment Judge Sanger, with the claimant and respondent both appearing in person.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was not well-founded and dismissed it. It also held that the complaint of failure to provide written particulars of wages was not well-founded and dismissed that claim as well.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found the complaint of failure to provide written particulars of wages was not well-founded. The judgment does not use a taxonomy-mapped claim type for this complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.