Case 6000113/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Klinger v Northern Life Care Limited t/a UBU and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000113/2022
- Decision date
- 14 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- H Brown, DW Eales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr C Klinger
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Leeds, sitting with Employment Judge Lancaster and lay members H Brown and DW Eales, heard the case by CVP on 12, 13 and 14 July 2023. It dismissed all three claims brought by Mr C Klinger against Northern Life Care Limited t/a UBU and Ms Gillian Bundy: unfair dismissal, direct age discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments.
The written record states only the outcomes of the claims and does not set out separate written reasons, because reasons were given orally at the hearing. The decision therefore records dismissal of the employment claims without further detail on the tribunal's factual findings or legal analysis in the written text supplied here.
The tribunal also ordered Mr Klinger to pay the respondents a contribution towards their costs, summarily assessed at £5,000.00. No compensatory award, injury to feelings award, or other substantive remedy was recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.