Case 6000128/2022 · Employment Tribunal
- MR D RUSHMERE (SOLICITOR) FOR THE v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000128/2022
- Decision date
- 18 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms C Monaghan, Ms L Simpson
Parties
1 namedClaimant
- MR D RUSHMERE (SOLICITOR) FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a costs judgment only. The tribunal, sitting at Bristol on 18 October 2024, considered the respondent’s application for an order that the claimant pay its costs under rule 76 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The unanimous judgment of Employment Judge Cadney, sitting with members Ms C Monaghan and Ms L Simpson, was that the respondent’s costs application was dismissed. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any split of costs by issue.
The judgment also notes that if either party sought full written reasons for the decision, it had to apply in writing within 14 days of promulgation. The record entered the register and copies were sent to the parties on 4 November 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The respondent applied for an order that the claimant pay its costs under rule 76 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal unanimously dismissed that application. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.