Case 6000144/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Muscroft v Cobra Traffic Management PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000144/2023
- Decision date
- 7 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Muscroft
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 17 August 2023 before Employment Judge Brain, the tribunal recorded that it was following a judgment on the question of disability for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 and amended the list of issues in the case management order dated 3 May 2022. The amended issues narrowed the disability-related questions to whether the claimant arranging to meet her GP on three occasions in October 2022 to discuss her anxiety arose in consequence of her disability, and whether the relevant PCPs put her at a substantial disadvantage compared with someone without her disability.
The order specified the substantial disadvantage issues as whether the claimant was more likely to take sick leave and then require a phased return, and whether she struggled to complete her full workload because her disability left her less productive than staff without her disability. It also required the claimant, by 25 August 2023, to confirm whether her complaint of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 was pursued or withdrawn. No liability decision or remedy was recorded in this extract. The order also set out the consequences of non-compliance, including a possible fine of up to £1,000 and the possibility of strike out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | This was a preliminary hearing order and did not determine liability; it amended the list of issues after a disability judgment and required the claimant to confirm whether the section 15 complaint was pursued or withdrawn. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.