Case 6000150/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Marsland v Keepmoat Homes Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000150/2023
- Decision date
- 13 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Marsland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Ahmed sitting alone on 13 July 2023. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal permitted the Claimant to amend her case to add a complaint that the Respondent failed to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010, but only in relation to the factual allegation identified in paragraph 13 of the proposed amendments document dated 26 May 2023. The tribunal expressly said that no leave was granted for any other type of disability discrimination complaint.
The respondent's application to strike out the unfair dismissal complaint was refused. The tribunal did not decide the unfair dismissal claim on its merits at this stage. The complaint of sex discrimination was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The case was listed for a further preliminary hearing to decide whether the Claimant was a disabled person and whether the complaints of unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and unlawful deduction of wages had been presented in time. No monetary award was made at this hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal granted leave to amend so the Claimant could include a complaint of failure to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20/21 Equality Act 2010, limited to the factual allegation in paragraph 13 of the proposed amendments document dated 26 May 2023. The tribunal said no leave was given for any other type of disability discrimination complaint. | Other | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent's application to strike out the unfair dismissal complaint was refused. No final merits determination was made at this hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of sex discrimination was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.