Case 6000159/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Ashworth v Ministry of Defence and eight others HELD in Hull — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000159/2022
- Decision date
- 16 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Ashworth
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 9 June 2023, Employment Judge Brain recorded that the claims against respondents other than the Ministry of Defence, together with the claims against the Ministry of Defence for direct discrimination because of sex and indirect discrimination in relation to sex and disability, were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The written record therefore reflects a procedural disposal rather than any substantive determination on the merits of those complaints.
No monetary award was made. The decision notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claims against respondents other than the Ministry of Defence were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct discrimination because of sex; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | Indirect discrimination in relation to sex; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect discrimination in relation to disability; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.