Case 6000161/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Peach v Jerk Junction Mcr Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000161/2025
- Decision date
- 30 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Peach
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Peach, succeeded on a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages against Jerk Junction Mcr Ltd. The Employment Judge noted that the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time and decided that the matter could properly be determined on the claim under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3,533.84. The tribunal also recorded that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum. The listed hearing on 7 May 2025 was cancelled.
The decision was sent to the parties on 30 April 2025. The accompanying interest notice stated that interest would be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 unless the sum was paid in full within 14 days of the relevant decision day, with the calculation day identified as 1 May 2025 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal determined the claim under Rule 22 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,533.84. | Upheld | — | £3,534 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,534
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,534
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.