Case 6000229/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Wulandari v BPA Corporate Facilitation Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000229/2023
- Decision date
- 2 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Appearances
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Wulandari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter was heard at Bristol on 24 January 2023 before Employment Judge Midgley. The claimant, Ms D Wulandari, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent, BPA Corporate Facilitation Ltd, appeared through Mrs Yates, described in the record as HR Directot.
The tribunal recorded that the claims were struck out pursuant to rule 37 on the basis that the claimant's failure to attend the hearing was unreasonable conduct, and/or pursuant to rule 47 on the basis of non-attendance at the hearing. The written record does not identify the underlying substantive claims beyond referring to them in the plural.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent. No remedy was awarded because the claims were struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying claim types. It states only that 'the claims' were struck out under rule 37 and/or rule 47 because of the claimant's non-attendance and unreasonable conduct. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.