Case 6000241/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Temelkova v Emerald Hotels 1 LP — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000241/2024
- Decision date
- 18 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Temelkova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Ms J Temelkova's claim against Emerald Hotels 1 LP. The reasons state that, by letter dated 3 October 2024, the Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 3 September 2024 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, to explain why the claim should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal decided that the claim should be struck out.
The judgment is a short case-management decision and records no substantive findings on liability and no monetary award. It was signed by Employment Judge Gray on 21 October 2024 and sent to the parties on 18 November 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not state the substantive claim type. The GOV.UK listing identifies race discrimination, but that is not stated in the reasons provided here. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.