Case 6000341/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alan Boxall v Lovall Stone Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000341/2024
- Decision date
- 23 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alan Boxall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a private case management hearing on 9 October 2024 before Employment Judge Midgley in Bristol by CVP audio. The claimant, Mr Alan Boxall, did not attend and was not represented. For the respondent, Lovall Stone Group Limited, Miss Victoria Watts, Archie Eke and Tom Waddington attended.
The tribunal recorded that the clerk called the claimant and left a message directing him to dial into the hearing, but the claimant still did not attend by 10:25am. In those circumstances, the tribunal struck out the claim pursuant to Employment Tribunal Rule 47.
The written record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No monetary remedy was awarded because the claim was struck out before any merits determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. The tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the case management hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.