Case 6000350/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person Interpreter: Ms Syta For the v Ms C Slevin – Solicitor — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000350/2024
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Dated
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person Interpreter: Ms Syta For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the public preliminary hearing in Bristol on 28 May 2025, before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms C Slevin, solicitor. The tribunal recorded that the claims before it were automatic constructive unfair dismissal, detriment on the grounds of protected disclosure/health and safety, unlawful deductions from wages, breach of contract, and arrears of holiday pay.
The tribunal dismissed all of those claims for want of jurisdiction because they had been presented out of time. No substantive merits findings are recorded in the written judgment, and the tribunal did not determine the underlying factual or legal issues beyond limitation/jurisdiction. The decision was dated 28 May 2025 and sent to the parties on 13 June 2025; the record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim described by the tribunal as automatic constructive unfair dismissal; dismissed for want of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim described as detriment on the grounds of protected disclosure/health and safety; dismissed for want of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for arrears of holiday pay dismissed for want of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.