Case 6000362/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Jones v Top to Bottom Cleaning Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000362/2024
- Decision date
- 11 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Danvers REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- By video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims for holiday pay and arrears of pay were dismissed upon withdrawal after the outstanding sums had been paid. The tribunal then found the complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded and held that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed.
On remedy for unfair dismissal, the tribunal found that the respondent had unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 and increased the compensatory award by 25% under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It also found that the claimant did not cause or contribute to the dismissal by blameworthy conduct, and it did not reduce the basic award for that reason.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £2,070.00 and a compensatory award of £2,830.86. The compensatory award comprised £2,232.69 for loss of earnings and pension contributions, less £368.00 paid in January 2023, plus £400.00 for loss of statutory rights and £566.17 by way of ACAS uplift. It recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded, but the tribunal held that no additional sum was payable. The redundancy payment claim failed because the claimant was not entitled to a redundancy payment under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal after the outstanding sums had been paid. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon withdrawal after the outstanding sums had been paid. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It awarded a basic award of £2,070.00 and a compensatory award of £2,830.86, including a 25% ACAS uplift. | Upheld | — | £4,901 |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay complaint was well-founded, but no additional sum was payable. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claimant was not entitled to a redundancy payment under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,901
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,070
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,831
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
- s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.