Case 6000364/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Coakley v Fays Flowers Growers Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000364/2025
- Decision date
- 23 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Coakley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss L Coakley presented her claim in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 5 January 2025. The respondent, Fays Flowers Growers Ltd, failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Miss Coakley £1,090.39. The judgment records the same figure as the total amount payable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 and found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £1,090 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,090
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.