Case 6000383/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Kershaw v First Choice Homes Oldham Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6000383/2025
- Decision date
- 24 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Thompson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Kershaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Thompson held that Mr M Kershaw's complaint of unfair dismissal under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was also well-founded. The written judgment records the determinations and remedy; the reasons were given orally.
For unfair dismissal, the Tribunal awarded £18,500 as a basic award and £500 for loss of statutory rights. Losses totalling £43,215.22 comprised past and future loss of earnings and pension losses. The Tribunal reduced that amount by 25% for contributory fault, from £43,215.22 to £32,411.42, made no Polkey reduction, and applied a 10% uplift under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 because First Choice Homes Oldham Limited unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015. This produced a compensatory award of £35,652.56. The notice-pay award was £5,223.51.
The Tribunal stated that the award was £59,925.97 before grossing up and £75,019.20 after grossing up, but limited compensation to a final total of £66,540.51. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefit) Regulations 1996 applied: £22,954.80 was the prescribed element attributable to benefits received from October 2024 to November 2025, leaving £43,585.71 payable pending recoupment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The listed unfair-dismissal components are a £18,500 basic award, £500 for loss of statutory rights and a £35,652.56 compensatory award. Together with the separate £5,223.51 breach-of-contract award, the listed components total £59,876.07, although the judgment states £59,925.97 before grossing up. The final grossing-up calculation and compensation cap are not apportioned between the claims. | Upheld | — | £54,653 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in relation to notice pay. | Upheld | — | £5,224 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £66,541
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £18,500
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £35,653
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
- contributory fault
- Polkey reduction
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.