Case 6000392/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Blondel v New Forest Rustic Furniture Ltd and 4 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000392/2023
- Decision date
- 21 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer Date
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Miss E Blondel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Volkmer entered judgment under Rule 21. The tribunal found that New Forest Rustic Furniture Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and ordered payment of £959.01 gross. It also found that the Claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,615.40 damages.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The First Respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £959.01 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £959 |
| Breach of contract | The Claimant was found to have been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and damages of £1,615.40 were ordered. | Upheld | — | £1,615 |
| Redundancy | The Claimant was found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,615.40. | Upheld | — | £1,615 |
| Holiday pay | The First Respondent was ordered to pay £1,211.54 for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,212 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,401
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.