Case 6000400/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Hitesh Prashar v Sales Management Institute Corporation and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 6000400/2025
- Decision date
- 13 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Hitesh Prashar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing the tribunal considered the respondents' application for strike out and/or a deposit order in respect of the claimant's breach of contract claims. The claimant's letter of appointment identified the First Respondent as his employer, so the claim against the Second Respondent was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.
The sole remaining issue was whether the claimant was entitled to 1 or 15 days' notice on termination. The letter of appointment provided for 15 days' notice by either party, while the First Respondent's Probation and Induction policy provided that an induction period of 7-10 days could be terminated on one day's notice; the claimant said he had not received this policy until after his employment ended. The claimant had worked on 9, 10 and 11 September 2024, was dismissed on 12 September 2024, and had been paid £225 for four days, which he accepted was correct.
The judge concluded that the claimant's case was arguable and could not be said to have no or little reasonable prospect of success. On a pragmatic basis, the First Respondent agreed that the judge should determine the matter that day, and judgment was entered against the First Respondent in the gross sum of £577.50 (11 working days x 3.5 hours x £15), subject to tax and National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim against the First Respondent for breach of contract regarding notice pay. Tribunal ordered the First Respondent to pay damages of £577.50 gross (subject to tax and NI), based on 11 working days at 3.5 hours x £15. | Upheld | — | £578 |
| Breach of contract | Claim against the Second Respondent (PMO Global Institute Inc.) struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success, because the claimant's letter of appointment made clear his employer was the First Respondent. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £578
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.