Case 6000414/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Mant v Molescroft Holdings Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000414/2024
- Decision date
- 2 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Mant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 13 June 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Maidment struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment does not record any merits findings on the underlying dismissal issue; it is a procedural strike-out decision only.
The judgment also records that the claimant’s remaining claims remained listed for hearing on 9 July 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant did not make written representations, or sufficient representations, in response to the strike-out warning dated 13 June 2024. The judgment states that the remaining claims were still listed for hearing on 9 July 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.