Case 6000455/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Predeth v Zayden Foods Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000455/2024
- Decision date
- 19 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Predeth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 13 February 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £215.35 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £93.11.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £308.46 in total. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Cadney dated 9 July 2024 and sent to the parties on 19 July 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; award stated as £215.35 gross (rounded to integer GBP). | Upheld | — | £215 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay claimant's holiday entitlement; award stated as £93.11 (rounded to integer GBP). | Upheld | — | £93 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £308
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.