Case 6000457/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Foley v Sherborne Area Schools' Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000457/2023
- Decision date
- 21 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Foley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an email dated 15 November 2023, the Tribunal gave Mrs T Foley an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 06 October 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Volkmer ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment contains no findings on the substantive merits of the underlying unfair dismissal or religion or belief discrimination complaints and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment does not identify a separate disposal for this claim beyond stating that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 06 October 2023 and did not actively pursue the case. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify a separate disposal for this claim beyond stating that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 06 October 2023 and did not actively pursue the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.