Case 6000468/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Zuchowicz v FLX Construction Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000468/2024
- Decision date
- 4 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cuthbert Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Zuchowicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the shortfall in pay of GBP 333.50, less any required deductions for tax and national insurance.
The Tribunal dismissed the respondent's employer's contract claim against the claimant. It stated that the claim did not fall within the Tribunal's jurisdiction under The Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeds and awards the shortfall in pay, less any required deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £334 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as the respondent's employer's contract claim against the claimant and dismisses it because it does not fall within the Tribunal's jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £334
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- The Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.