Case 6000482/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Greasley v Mid Yorkshire Hospital NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000482/2024
- Decision date
- 3 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Greasley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the complaints of direct disability discrimination, automatic unfair dismissal, and ordinary unfair dismissal. The reason given was that the claimant had failed to pay any of the deposits ordered on 7 April 2025.
The judgment states that those complaints amounted to the totality of the claimant's claims in the proceedings. The hearing listed for 2, 3, 4 and 5 December 2025 was therefore cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct disability discrimination was struck out because the claimant failed to pay any of the deposits ordered on 7 April 2025. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of ordinary unfair dismissal was struck out because the claimant failed to pay any of the deposits ordered on 7 April 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers to automatic unfair dismissal being struck out. The gov.uk listing category is Public Interest Disclosure, but the judgment text itself does not further describe the basis of the automatic unfair dismissal complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.