Case 6000487/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z. Fabian v SKF UK Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000487/2024
- Decision date
- 14 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr G.
- Venue
- Bristol ET
- Panel members
- Mrs S. Maidment, Mr H. Adams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z. Fabian
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Bristol Employment Tribunal on 8 and 9 April 2025 before Employment Judge G. King, sitting with Mrs S. Maidment and Mr H. Adams. The claimant was Mr Z. Fabian and the respondent was SKF UK Ltd.
The written judgment records only the outcomes. The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was found not well founded and dismissed. The claimant's claim of discrimination on the grounds of religious belief was also found not well founded and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the claim of discrimination on the grounds of religious belief was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.