Case 6000494/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Mironova v BFS Group Limited HELD AT: Leeds Employment Tribunal — 2026
- Case reference
- 6000494/2024
- Decision date
- 30 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Mironova
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims for automatic unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal.
The tribunal also dismissed the claims for direct disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and direct race discrimination. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim for automatic unfair dismissal is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim for direct disability discrimination is dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments is dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim for direct race discrimination is dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.