Case 6000499/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Fercik v 1) Grovewise Consultants Ltd trading as Forte Reliable Staffing Agency & Best Recruitment 2) Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000499/2023
- Decision date
- 11 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Fercik
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Dawson sitting alone at Southampton on 20 May 2024 to identify the issues and determine the respondents' applications to strike out the claims and for a deposit order. The claimant, an agency worker supplied by the 1st respondent to the 2nd respondent's nursing home on 7 November 2022, alleged race discrimination on the basis that she was required to perform kitchen, pot washing and cleaning duties because she is non-British/East European, and also brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim.
The tribunal dismissed the application to strike out the race discrimination claim, holding that such claims should generally not be struck out where central facts are in dispute and a fair trial remained possible. However, the tribunal concluded the race claim had little reasonable prospect of success because the claimant could point to no evidence that a British agency worker would have been treated differently, and it was at least as likely she was treated as she was because she was an agency worker rather than because of her race; a deposit order was therefore appropriate.
The unlawful deduction from wages claim was struck out. The claimant accepted she carried out no work on 9 November 2022 (so any loss was properly characterised as flowing from the alleged discrimination rather than as a deduction) and that she was in fact paid £10.50 per hour for 7 November 2022, so no deduction had occurred.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Strike out application dismissed; claim survives but tribunal found it has little reasonable prospect of success and ordered a deposit. Substantive outcome not yet determined at this preliminary hearing. | Other | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success: claimant accepted she did no work on 9 November 2022 and that she was in fact paid the full £10.50 per hour for 7 November 2022, so no deduction was suffered. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded in the reasons as having been struck out on 21 February 2024 for non-compliance with an unless order; not adjudicated at this hearing. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- Rule 37 of Schedule 1 of the 2013 Rules
- Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust [2007] ICR 1126 CA
- Balls v Downham Market High School & College [2011] IRLR 217
- Tayside Public Transport Co Ltd t/a Travel Dundee v Reilly [2012] IRLR 755 CS
- Romanowska v Aspirations Care Ltd UKEAT/0015/14
- Ukegheson v Haringey London Borough Council [2015] ICR 1285
- Chandhok v Tirkey [2015] IRLR 195
- Hussain v UPS UKEAT/0221/17/DM
- section 109 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.