Case 6000539/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. B Rychlik v Fresh Start Property Solutions Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000539/2023
- Decision date
- 8 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. B Rychlik
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52 in which Employment Judge Buckley recorded that the claims for unfair dismissal and whistleblowing (public interest disclosure detriment/dismissal) were dismissed after the claimant withdrew them. The judgment does not contain findings on the merits of those claims or any remedy award.
The same judgment states that the claim for race discrimination would proceed to a hearing. No substantive determination of that claim is made in this document, so the judgment is limited to the dismissal of the withdrawn claims and the procedural position of the remaining race discrimination claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52; no merits determination recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers to whistleblowing as public interest disclosure detriment/dismissal; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.