Case 6000549/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Wheeler v Chilworth Manor Limited t/a Best Western Chilworth Manor Hotel RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000549/2024
- Decision date
- 9 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Wheeler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, an HR Administrator employed part-time by Chilworth Manor Limited from September 2021 to January 2024, brought a claim of unfair dismissal after being made redundant. She accepted that the procedural steps of warning, consultation, fair selection and offer of redeployment had been followed, but contended that the redundancy was a sham and that the true reason for her dismissal was her earlier grievances against the General Manager and over pay.
Applying the three-stage test in Safeway Stores plc v Burrell (endorsed in Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd), Employment Judge Self found there was a genuine redundancy situation. The hotel owner had instructed a minimum payroll saving of £100,000 in response to the hotel being £259,200 behind budget and in special measures, and the Claimant's role had in practice been absorbed by the new Hotel Manager for some months before her dismissal. Several other staff were dismissed at around the same time, and the process was instigated at a level removed from anyone with prior involvement in the Claimant's grievances.
The tribunal was not satisfied evidentially that personal hostility arising from the Claimant's earlier complaints had influenced her selection, noting in particular that the Respondent had offered her alternative employment in Food and Beverage at the same salary, which she declined for career reasons. The judge observed in passing that, as a matter of good practice, Mr Skeet should not have heard the grievance appeal given his prior involvement, but that this was not a complaint raised by the Claimant. The dismissal was found to be wholly attributable to redundancy and the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claimant contended her redundancy was a sham and that the true reason for dismissal was her earlier grievances. The tribunal found the reason for dismissal was genuine redundancy and that the process (warning, consultation, fair selection, offer of alternative role in Food and Beverage) was fair. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Safeway Stores plc v Burrell 1997 ICR 523
- Murray and anor v Foyle Meats Ltd 1999 ICR 827
- ACAS Code on Discipline and Grievances at Work
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.