Case 6000567/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person, supported by her husband Mr I L Rice For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000567/2023
- Decision date
- 20 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge James
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr K Smith, Ms H Brown
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person, supported by her husband Mr I L Rice For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds, after the hearing on 17 to 21 and 24 to 25 June 2024, Employment Judge James sitting with Mr K Smith and Ms H Brown recorded that the claimant’s constructive unfair dismissal claim under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996, her whistle-blowing detriment claims under s.47B, her disability discrimination claims under ss.15, 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010, and her holiday pay claim under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 were not upheld and were dismissed. The notice pay / wrongful dismissal claim was recorded as withdrawn and dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested by a party. On the face of the document, the operative decisions are set out without further narrative reasoning or findings beyond the claim-by-claim outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded as constructive unfair dismissal under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim for whistle-blowing detriments under s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Grouped claim under ss.15, 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 / Working Time Regulations 1998. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Notice pay claim was recorded as withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.