Case 6000580/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms S Percival, Solicitor — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000580/2024
- Decision date
- 7 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a short judgment sent on 7 January 2025, Employment Judge N J Roper struck out the claimant's claim for detriment on the ground of having made protected public interest disclosures under Rule 38. The judgment identifies the respondent as Royal Mail Group Limited and records that the hearing was held by CVP on 7 January 2025.
The tribunal stated that the strike-out did not affect the claimant's remaining claims, which were listed in the case management order made on the same date. The judgment contains no further findings on the merits of those remaining claims and no remedy was awarded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the claimant's claim for detriment on the ground of having made protected public interest disclosures was struck out under Rule 38. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.