Case 6000596/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Butt v Avalon Interiors Limited DEFAULT — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000596/2024
- Decision date
- 3 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Butt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a default judgment issued by Employment Judge Self in the matter of Ms T Butt against Avalon Interiors Limited. The tribunal found each of the claimant's four claims to be well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the corresponding sums.
The judgment ordered payment of £3,251.04 for a redundancy payment, £1,329.45 for unpaid notice pay, £208.40 for unpaid accrued holiday pay, and £92.56 for unlawful deduction (non-payment) of wages. The total sum payable by the respondent to the claimant under the judgment is £4,881.45.
The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Self on 2 April 2025 and sent to the parties on 3 April 2025. As a default judgment, no substantive reasoning, legal test analysis, or panel discussion is recorded in the document.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Default judgment; claim for a redundancy payment found well-founded. | Upheld | — | £3,251 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for unpaid notice pay found well-founded; treated as breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £1,329 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid accrued holiday pay found well-founded. | Upheld | — | £208 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction (non-payment) of wages found well-founded. | Upheld | — | £93 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,881
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.