Case 6000605/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Colin Wilder v Martin-Brower UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000605/2024
- Decision date
- 5 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gibb Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Colin Wilder
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment for this case is a short record of outcome only. It identifies the parties, records that the matter was heard at Southampton Employment Tribunal by CVP on 21 and 22 November 2024 before Employment Judge Gibb, and states that the claimant was represented in person and the respondent by counsel.
The only substantive determination recorded in the written reasons is that the claimant's claim was dismissed. The note at the end of the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in time, so the written record does not set out the tribunal's factual findings or legal reasoning in detail.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record only states that the claimant's claim was dismissed. The judgment does not set out the oral reasons in writing; the claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.