Case 6000625/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J. Toogood v Skoops DS Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000625/2025
- Decision date
- 9 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J. Toogood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J. Toogood appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. Employment Judge Sudra, sitting alone at London South on 9 June 2025, held that the claimant's claims for statutory redundancy pay, unauthorised deductions from wages, and breach of contract were well founded and upheld.
The tribunal awarded £2,115 for statutory redundancy pay, £1,359 for unpaid wages, £1,880 for accrued unpaid holiday pay, £1,410 for unpaid notice pay, and £940 for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment. The total payable by the respondent was £7,704, to be paid within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of sending the decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy pay awarded in the sum of £2,115, calculated in the judgment as 470 x 1.5 x 3. | Upheld | — | £2,115 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award covered unpaid wages (£1,359) and accrued unpaid holiday pay (£1,880). | Upheld | — | £3,239 |
| Breach of contract | Award for unpaid notice pay, stated as three weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,410 |
| Other | Awarded for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £940 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,704
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.