Case 6000627/2025 · Employment Tribunal
S Baker v Time & Talents Association RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2026
- Case reference
- 6000627/2025
- Decision date
- 18 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Baker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The final hearing listed for 4 and 5 November 2027 was cancelled.
The record states that summary reasons were given orally at the hearing. No written reasons are included in the judgment text, and no remedy or monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment does not give written reasons or separately identify claim types; unfair dismissal is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment does not give written reasons or separately identify claim types; redundancy is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.